Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Notes from the Short Sale Trenches

November 29, 2011 by J. Philip Faranda

Athletes speak of a “good tired” and a “bad tired” after a game, good after a win and bad after a loss. Tonight I am the good kind of tired. 13 months ago I met with a very nice lady in White Plains who called me after a Realtor she was interviewing proposed that since she was a short sale, she should deposit an amount equal to the commission in escrow with the broker to ensure their fee payment. That didn’t strike her as terribly kosher, she got on the Internet to research short sales in Westchester County, and she found me.

 

I got the listing; Ms. Escrowed Commission didn’t. The condo market was slow at that time, and we went the first 6 months with only one aborted offer. However, I earned her trust in the process and got an extention. We determined that in order to secure a buyer, we should clean up the overgrown outside patio. I put on jeans one afternoon and trimmed, raked and perspired the area to an appealing level. It worked. This past June we got our buyer, and in perhaps some of the best work I have ever seen from our team, the approval came through on August 2nd.

 

You read that right. It took us under 60 days to get the short sale approved (with two lenders!), but we didn’t close for another 4 months. When the buyer was unable to close at the end of August for what was then an unknown reason, we got a rare 30-day extension from the two lenders-yes, two lenders. When the second deadline approached, the buyer was again not ready. For the first time in my career, we got a second extension from both lenders. As the 3rd deadline approached, we discovered the buyer’s problem: They didn’t tell us this, but to raise their downpayment they were refinancing another property. This was a very unsettling revelation. Had we known that their mortgage hinged on such a dubious condition (a financed down payment), we might never have engaged them.

 

As you might imagine, the stress on my client, an Ivy League graduate, a cancer survivor and a single mother, was mammoth. As you might not have imagined, we actually had to negotiate a THIRD extension with both lenders, and were told that no further extensions would be granted. On the Tuesday before Thanksgiving, their refinance closed. Today, we closed our tranaction one day before our final deadline. My client, a hardworking soul, hugged me after the closing was buttoned up and returned to her job to finish her day.

 

Sometimes, you can do a great job and have it squandered because the people on the other side of the table aren’t on point themselves. Among the crosses we had to bear were a frustratingly uncommunicative attorney on the other side, and a weak and not terribly forthcoming buyer. I truly believe the agent on the other side was not at fault and frankly aghast at events on their side. My seller and her attorney, two consummate professionals and people of high character, did voice their feelings-professionally and calmly- at the closing table and left complete.

 

There are very few easy deals, and that is especially the case on this deal. Tonight, I will sleep soundly. And so will my client.

Posted in Short Sales, Success Stories | Tagged , | Leave a Comment »

Short Sales are Not to Blame for Market Decline

June 3, 2011 by J. Philip Faranda

A client forwarded me the link on Inman News to this broker in Nevada who blames short sale agents and sellers for the mess.

 Prices keep falling because the short-sale agents are listing at 5 to 10 percent below comps in order to try to get an offer, and often are accepting offers at even less. The banks come back at a higher price, and then the buyer walks. The downward momentum has been coming from the short sales, not from the REO listings.

All real estate is local, and perhaps there are many under-priced short sales in Nevada, but isn’t Nevada also one of the highest foreclosure states in the USA? It most certainly is. As a matter of fact, it is the NUMBER ONE ranked state for foreclosures, with 1 out of 97 households with filings, a staggering number when you consider that 2nd-ranked Arizona is at 1 out of 205.

I commented as follows:

I can only speak for my local market and not the author’s marketplace, but if the claim is true, then all those bank owned REO listings that have undercut the market have taken their queue from short sales.

I find that hard to believe.

Since lenders render a decision based on market activity, I wonder what sort of agent would ever responsibly list a short sale at such a fantasy price as 10-15 % below comparable sales.

What may be closer to the truth is that the author sees short sales selling 10-15% below unrealistic asking prices, which sit and rot while losing the war of attrition with buyers who won’t bite, while short sales are listed and sold at a number in line with actual sales.

“Market value” is what buyers are willing to pay, not what some sellers wish they could get.

Short sales reflect the market. They do not set it.

 

I know of no empirical data that suggests that the problem started with short sales. Banks only approve short sales based on market sales. Not asking prices. A short sale could very well be listed 10-15% below the competition. But the competing listings are probably overpriced, because guess what? They aren’t selling! To price a home to sell, you have to look at the sales, not the asking prices. Some of these unsold homes are on their 4th brokerage and are still chasing the market (and not running very fast either).

I do agree that banks often counter at higher prices, and that is because the historical comparables are from the last 6 months, and when the market is falling, historical look-backs are at a time when prices are higher. Short sales reflect falling prices. They don’t cause it. You can’t sell a house for “below” market value, because guess what? If it were underpriced, the buying public would bid it up. Where do we see that most often? Yup, you guessed it- bank owned foreclosures. Not short sales.

Market value is only what people are willing to pay. NOT what sellers or their brokers wish they could get.

Posted in Short Sales | Tagged | Leave a Comment »

When Everyone Walks Away with Money Exept the Seller

March 26, 2011 by J. Philip Faranda

Just about every home sale is stressful on the seller. A short sale, given the higher stakes and financial ramifications, often has even more stress for the seller than a typical transaction. On a few occasions, I have had a short sale client lament that they are “left out” in a way, in that everyone is going to walk away from the closing with money except them. Short sale sellers realize no proceeds at closing.

I recall the first instance where this occurred; the seller didn’t really want to sell, and was dismayed at what her perceived as a feeding frenzy around him over his loss. The agents were making a fee, the lawyers were getting a check, and he’d lose his house. It didn’t seem right to him. The listing expired unsold 3 years ago, and it remains unsold with the 3rd listing agent. I don’t think the people could let go.

So what it in it for someone to do a short sale when they don’t get any money? Quite a bit if you ask me.

You avoid a foreclosure. A good point was made by the Distressed Property Institute in the CDPE course: negative trade lines lose their punch and fall off over time, but the one question on every mortgage application is “have you ever had a foreclosure?”

You leave your home with dignity. That goes for you and the neighborhood. Anyone who sells their home moves out on their own terms. Nobody evicts them, and nobody knocks on the door informing them he represents the lender and the house is now theirs. Short sale sellers pack their things and move to their next home like anyone else. And the neighborhood avoids the blight of a bank owned REO and all the baggage that comes with it.

You minimize the impact to your credit. A foreclosure is a nuclear event in credit. I could name nothing worse. While many people who do sell short have late payments, if they manage things correctly they can often be qualified to buy again in 24 months.

You avoid a deficiency judgment. A properly negotiated short sale typically results in the waiver of any deficiency. The slate is wiped clean. As I told my former client, if he just let the house go to foreclosure he wouldn’t get any money either. Worse, a deficiency judgment could haunt him thereafter.

I suppose there are other reasons, but to those who view a short sale as unpalatable, I would ask what they’d propose as a better option. Sometimes you have to choose your poison. Banks aren’t modifying loans these days- as a matter of fact, many of my clients came to me after they were turned down a 2nd and 3rd attempt to modify. You may not walk away with money in a short sale these days. But in a successfully negotiated short sale, do do get something few people consider: a second chance.

To add one more point, there are programs coming into prominence that do offer sellers a small stipend in a short sale, some as much as $7,000. I saw a letter from Chase today referencing up to a $20,000 credit for a short sale. I am sure the small print is copious for that, but HAFA is the first place we are going with our clients in short sales so they can get a credit from their lender at closing. Not every short sale broker is alike. You need a good one who knows how to get the debt discharged and the deficiency waived.

 

Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , | Leave a Comment »

Please Take Off Your Clothes

March 3, 2011 by J. Philip Faranda

I just finished my first day of CDPE (Certified Distressed Property Expert) class, and am reflecting on one of the more profound insights given by the instructor, Mark Boyland. Mark, who is an excellent presenter, compared the difficult issues we have to sort out with distressed homeowners with the rather matter of fact way a doctor handles another rather touchy thing:

“Please take off your clothes. “

At my last physical, the doctor hardly looked up from his clipboard when he said that. But he was pretty comfortable about the request- so comfortable, that it seemed as mundane as asking his secretary if anyone called while he was out.

Now, when a guy is that blasé about your prostate test, there is a lesson to be learned.

We have to ask clients questions that are probing and invasive in any other context but real estate:

  • How much do you owe on your house?
  • Are you current on your mortgage?
  • Why did you fall behind on your payments?
  • Etc. etc.
These aren’t comfortable questions to ask. And the answers might be very difficult to examine for a seller who is facing foreclosure or imminent default. But we have to ask.  As I have blogged before, privacy does not reside in a vacuum. The more we know about a client’s situation, the better we can serve them.

A physician can’t give a physical to a person in a parka. We can’t help a distressed home seller whose equity position and status with their mortgage company is a mystery. We have obligations of disclosure to others in the market place, but more importantly the answers to the uncomfortable questions affect our pricing strategy, marketing, negotiation methodology, and literally dozens of other critical issues that arise in the obstacle-laden, serpentine maze of loss mitigation.

We are between borrowers under financial stress and a large monolithic financial institution. Information is crucial. Patients need to tell their doctor where it hurts or they can’t be helped. It is the same in real estate. It isn’t fun to ask these personal financial questions, and while some of us are more comfortable than others about it, we have to ask. The more honest and forthcoming the client is in their answers, the higher the likelihood that they can be helped.

Posted in Commentary, Short Sales | Tagged , , | 3 Comments »

How Much of a Loss Will The Bank Accept in a Short Sale?

February 11, 2011 by J. Philip Faranda

How much of a loss will the lender accept in a short sale? I am asked this from time to time by consumers and agents alike. We always disclose when a property is being sold subject to lender approval, and I understand the rationale for asking about the numbers, especially with the high dollar value of New York area properties, but the question is actually a non sequitur. Here’s why:

Which home has a better chance of having the short sale being approved:

  • A $600,000 home with a $650,000 mortgage
  • A $600,000 home with a $850,000 mortgage

Many people assume that the house with the $50,000 shortfall is the one that will be easier to have the short sale approved. That assumption is incorrect. The fact of the matter is that the amount that the lender loses in a short sale is immaterial to the approval. Once hardship is established, short sale approval is based on the banks’s valuation of the home, chiefly through an appraisal or Broker Price Opinion (BPO). The lender could be losing $25,000 or $250,000- it doesn’t matter. It all hinges on that appraisal or BPO.

Why? Because you can’t expect to get more than the market will bring. And if the lender has to seize the home, they will do a BPO on the home and price it accordingly with no regard for the loan amount they foreclosed on. The lender is simply trying to minimize their loss. For that reason, the buyer’s terms are less important in many cases. A regular seller might give a significant premium to a cash buyer for example. A lender in a short sale probably won’t give that term much deference at all.

Therefore, the big question in a short sale is not how much the bank is losing or what they are owed, but if the offer on the table reflects comparable sales activity. That is the great yardstick by which approvals are measured.

 

Posted in Commentary, Short Sales | Tagged , , | 1 Comment »

Buying a Short Sale: Market Value, Not a Steal

February 2, 2011 by J. Philip Faranda

As short sales have become more common and are even showing up in new markets in Westchester, I find myself educating my colleagues on what can and cannot be done in order to have a successful closing. Lately, we’ve received offers that are unrealistically low; essentially, what the buyers do not understand is that the lender is going to evaluate their offer based on comparable market activity, not their speculative attempts to get a bargain. 

I don’t blame buyers for wanting to get a good deal. I want the same thing for my own buyers- who doesn’t? But the lender in a short sale is not nearby, so they hire a professional to determine the value. Typically an appraisal or a broker price opinion are done and sent to the bank. If the BPO or appraisal match or are close to the offer, and approval is likely. If the offer is considerably lower than the bank findings, the lender will ask for more money. 

This is where agents need to educate the buying public. It is irresponsible to tie a house under contract for  an unrealistic low amount.  No seller can risk several months waiting for the bank to issue an inevitable denial when the home could have been active on the market and attracted a better offer. ”Short sale” is not code for a steal. Buyers should ask their agent for comparable activity and formulate their offer based on realistic events. 

The market in Westchester County is relatively strong compared to much of the rest of the USA. Local activity is relevant to the short sale approval, not the considerably more depressed values in other areas of the nation. Buyers should base their offers on comparable sales (which we have in abundance in New York) and not speculation. I would encourage any buyer to read my prior post on short sales and what you need to know before buying one. 

Previous articles on Short Sales from my Active Rain Blog.

Posted in Short Sales | Tagged , | Leave a Comment »

Will I Have to Pay Taxes After a Short Sale?

January 28, 2011 by J. Philip Faranda

The concern of some homeowners looking to do a short sale that a 1099 issued from the bank will expose them to a new problem, namely a huge income tax bill on the forgiven debt, is understandable. With home values in Westchester in 2010 at a median of $630,000, a six figure 1099 is entirely possible. In the past, a bank could issue a 1099 for forgiven debt, rendering it akin to income for tax purposes.

However, even if the bank does issue a 1099, the likelihood that you’ll have a tax problem is virtually nonexistant for owner occupants thanks to a law passed in 2007, the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act. From the IRS website:

The Act applies only to forgiven or cancelled debt used to buy, build or substantially improve your principal residence, or to refinance debt incurred for those purposes. In addition, the debt must be secured by the home. This is known as qualified principal residence indebtedness.

Most definitions of “principle residence” mean that you have resided there for at least 2 of the prior 5 years. That means that if you move out due to a job transfer or or other reason, you are not out of luck. Obviously, as a licensed real estate broker I do not give tax advice. You have to consult a tax professional like a CPA. However, make sure you discuss this law when you speak. It runs through 2012, and may well be extended.

 

Posted in Short Sales | Tagged , , , | Leave a Comment »

Recent Media Appearances

December 9, 2010 by J. Philip Faranda

I have been prominent in two separate stories in the media this past week regarding default properties and their effect on the market and the borrower. This past Sunday I was in the New York Times, and on Tuesday I was in a nice piece on AOL Daily Finance.

The Times piece centered on strategic defaults, where borrowers who could otherwise afford a mortgage stop paying on purpose. Many people who do this do so for cash flow reasons; if you paid $350,000 for a house in the peak and the same house is for sale at foreclosure down the street for $180,000, some people just buy the cheaper one and let the old house go, cutting their payment. However, the credit consequences can be dire. The debate on the ethics of the practice is heated.

The AOL Daily Finance article is part of a series on how the housing crisis has affected different places. Mount Vernon, a city in Southern Westchester County which has been rife with short sales and foreclosures, was discussed in the article. Values are down in the neighborhood I am quoted on about 50%. What is not mentioned is that many of the foreclosures were actually renovated by the prior owner before they ran into financial problems, which punctuates the crisis, for me, in a very sad way. You hate to witness broken dreams.

Which is why we work so hard on getting our short sales closed and done for our clients. Preventing foreclosures is what we are all about.

Posted in Short Sales | Tagged , , , | Leave a Comment »

How Do You Price a Short Sale?

November 14, 2010 by J. Philip Faranda

After two similar discussions the past week, it would be wise to address how a short sale should be priced. After all, if the offer submitted to the lender is subject to approval and therefore not a certainty, all the more that the asking price is also a hypothesis.

It is. But, as educated guesses go, a good short sale broker’s list price is pretty educated. It takes into account comparable sales, competing listings, and, sometimes, the gut sense of a seasoned professional. You have to skate a nuanced line in some cases between what will get the phone to ring and what the lender will sign off on.

I have blogged before on the stress that a short sale can put on a home seller. They are typically in default, getting collection calls and letters from the bank, facing the steps up to a foreclosure, and often overwhelmed with distress. When one is under stress, it is natural to instinctively move to eliminate the source of the stress, so often sellers want to lower the price to get moving, and dramatically so. The problem is that if you lower the price to be the lowest asking price the neighborhood has seen in 5 years, you can foster too much skepticism from the lender and  the offers you get might not be enough for the bank accept.

For example, if comparable sales put your homes estimated value at $400,000, it is irresponsible to whack the price to $320,000 just to get an offer and be done with it. You have to balance between what the buying public will respond to and what the lender will accept. And few homes sell in 10 or 20 days. It takes some time. Not all short sales tale a long time to find a buyer,  but some can, and too many reductions too soon can sabotage your efforts.

The best (and really only) approach is to price the home aggressively based on comparable sales, and then review and reduce every 30 days unless market activity indicates something faster. But it is market activity, and not nerves or stress, that should source the price strategy.

Posted in Short Sales | Tagged , , | 3 Comments »

Can an Owner Reject an Offer in a Short Sale?

October 29, 2010 by J. Philip Faranda

Contrary to what some may think, an owner is not obligated to submit every offer to the lender for approval in order to do a short sale. As a matter of fact, there are offers that an owner should never submit to the lender. That is the owner’s right, as they still hold title and ownership of the property, and the bank’s decision in a short payoff is simply the amount they’ll take to release the lien and settle the debt.

In Westchester and the surrounding areas of New York, offers are not submitted to the lender for approval, contracts of sale are. And those contracts are between buyer and seller, not the bank. The contracts are conditioned upon bank approval, but they are binding contracts none the less. And it can take every bit of 3-6 months for the lender to render a decision, all while the foreclosure wheel turns. If the owner goes to contract with an offer that is less than a realistic expectation of value, they can be six months closer to foreclosure when the bank issues their denial of the short sale.

Sellers are therefore looking for realistic offers, not for their own pockets, but to ensure the bank accepts the short payoff. If an offer can be judged favorably by 3 recent (i.e., 6 months or less) closed and 3 active comparables, the offer bodes well. Buyers who submit speculatively low offers, unsupported by 3 sold and 3 active,  are doing something ill advised; if their amount is not close to what comparable sales for similar properties are getting on the market, they could waste months waiting for the inevitable “no.” And that “no” could cost the owners their house.

We have a enough offers in multiple bid situations meeting resistance to the banks; lowball offers invite peril to the seller and frustration to the buyer. And it is ultimately the sellers decision as to whom they’ll go to contract with. A short sale sellers surrenders proceeds. But no owner surrenders their rights. While the bank makes the final decision on amount, it is the owner, on advice and market data from their agent, who determine what to submit to the bank for that decision.

Posted in Commentary, Short Sales | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

NY Times: Banks Resisting Short Sales

October 26, 2010 by J. Philip Faranda

The top emailed story on the New York Times website today, Short Sales Resisted as Foreclosures Are Revived, is over 2 days old. That it remains pinned as the top story to share is significant, especially to anyone in New York who is facing foreclosure or in a short sale. Bank of America has, after an absurdly short period of time, ended its moratorium on foreclosures and deemed that its house is in order to resume foreclosures. Aside from the field day that thousands of attorneys will have in the coming years with this, my thoughts are a mixture of dislike for the decision and sadness for borrowers who are in default with Bank of America.

The resistence to short sales is particularly unfortunate. The suspension was hoped to be a catalyst for making short sales a more viable option, but banks have yet to devote sufficient resources to streamline the process. The rationale is a fear of fraud, but fraud only accounts for a minuscule percentage of short sales- like 1 or 2 percent. The other 98 or 99% ought not to suffer because of it. The resumption of foreclosures removes any chances of positive change, unless the government steps in, which the Obama administration seems unwilling to do.

There is a silver lining to the story: The New York Times is finally getting interested in examining why banks resist short sales when they are so much of a better option for all involved. The Times is also starting to follow the money- banks do have some financial incentives, such as accounting practices which you or I could not do to write off a loss, which makes foreclosures more attractive.

Make no bones about it: in the absence of a government with a spine, banks will look at short term gain and little else. Changing their architecture to accommodate short sales is an expense and a learning curve, and they will resort to dumb rationalizations and red tape hell to keep the foreclosure train rolling.

This makes a savvy short sale specialist more of a necessity than ever. We are still batting .900, closing  more than 90% of the short sales we list, and I think it is due in no small part to understanding who, and what, we are dealing with. Choose your agent wisely.

Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , , , | Leave a Comment »

Short Sale Fraud and Strawmen

October 24, 2010 by J. Philip Faranda

This article in today’s NY Times makes reference to banks being reticent to approve short sale because of a fear of fraud. This is not the first I have heard the concern, and while any fraud is wrong, the argument is a straw man excuse to not streamline the process. Are there fraudulent short sales, where a family member buys and rents back, or an investor is flipping the house at a below market purchase? Yes. Should that ruin it for the 99% of the rest of the people? No, of course it shouldn’t. It is like being against health insurance because there are hypochondriacs out there.

A very small percentage of short sales are fraudulent.

Per the Times:

Concerns about fraud are one of the reasons lenders are so careful about short sales. Sometimes well-off homeowners want to portray their finances as dire and cut their losses on a property. In other instances, distressed homeowners try to make a short sale to a relative, who would then sell it back to them (a practice that is illegal). A recent industry report estimates that short sale fraud occurs in at least 2 percent of sales and costs banks about $300 million annually.

So 98% of the people should suffer? You’ll probably see the similar percentages on shoplifting. Should we close the malls?

It is just another excuse to not do the right thing.

$300 million is a drop in the bucket compared to the massive amount of wealth that has been plundered by the banks’ own fraud and deception. I’ll say it again: In the New York area, and Westchester county, where I am based, the property values are enormous and the dollars at stake for the regular borrowers facing foreclosure are enormous. They need to be treated right and presumed innocent.

Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , | Leave a Comment »

Who Negotiates a Short Sale in New York?

October 23, 2010 by J. Philip Faranda

Recently, a listing brokerage instructed one of my agents to include a HUD-1 as part of our client’s offer on that brokerage’s short sale listing. To say that it was a peculiar request is an understatement; The HUD-1, which is a mandatory form in any transaction involving a mortgage financing, itemizes and documents all expenses for both buyer and seller. In New York, especially Westchester and the Metropolitan area, it is prepared by the seller’s attorney in a short sale, with approval from the bank approving the short sale, the  buyer’s attorney, their bank attorney, and the title company. Aside from the real estate commission line item, there is no involvement of the real estate agent.

While the request was for a “preliminary” HUD-1 and not the final form, the instruction for us to provide one was ill advised and questionable to my thinking. A I said, the form includes the seller’s expenses as well. How can the buyer’s agent possibly know the seller’s mortgage amount, mortgage payoff, back taxes, back payments, or other liens and expenses? The answer is that they can’t, unless the seller provides it. Why the seller would provide such information to the other side in a transaction is beyond me. They have their own fiduciary in their listing agent and attorney.

Maybe they had a great, innovative point; if so, I didn’t glean it from their Kramdenesque stutter when I inquired. We had an offer. They needed to present it and crunch the numbers on behalf of their client.

Upon occassion, I am contacted by “short sale investors” who promise my full commission, will buy my listing for cash, and re-list the house with me after they close. Tantalizing, huh? Oh, just one little thing: They want to negotiate the short sale themselves. In other words, they want to be an authorized third party designated by my seller client to deal with my seller’s bank.

No deal. You know who deals with my seller’s lender? Myself and the seller’s attorney as their fiduciary advocates. The bank won’t even talk to us for reasons of confidentiality without a signature authorization from the client. For a seller to authorize the purchaser to negotiate on their behalf with the bank for the short sale is antithetical to any agency rule on a listed home I have ever known.

As I said, it is the seller’s broker and lawyer who negotiate a short sale in New York. There are some outside companies who are paid by the seller to do so for a fee, but I do not hire them. I refer my short sale clients to an attorney who can do short sales in their sleep.

The point here is that everyone needs to play their position in a short sale transaction, and that our fiduciary responsibilities and duties to be an advocate don’t go out the window when a short sale is involved.

Who negotiates for the seller? It should be the people the sellers hire, preferably their agent and attorney, not the people they sell to.

Originally posted on my Westchester Real Estate Blog.

Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , | Leave a Comment »

Weak Leadership

October 18, 2010 by J. Philip Faranda

Being a businessman I seldom delve into politics in this platform, but it is clear to me that part of the problem in affecting a sustainable recovery is a lack of political will in our current leadership, including the White House, after reading this gem in the Times on the foreclosure fraud crisis:

the Obama administration has resisted calls for a more forceful response, worried that added pressure might spook the banks and hobble the broader economy.

So we’ll just spook the borrowers, who are already hammered and traumatized. Protect the banks. Look, I am a brazen capitalist and this is insanity. Insanity! And both parties are culpable.

In our local elections, state Senator Suzi Oppenheimer has been devoting the bulk of her campaign to going negative on challenger Bob Cohen, accusing him of being a slumlord, among other things. Cohen, who apparently owns  a number of buildings in the Bronx, is having tenant complaints and other dirty laundry aired by Ms. Oppenheimer in her bid for re election. This skirts the real issues. Cohen, a real estate guy, for all his blemishes might actually have more insight into our problems than the Senator, who has been in Albany since 1985. This is not an endorsement. It is conjecture. But neither candidate is addressing the issues facing the electorate while we discuss the man’s apartment buildings.

Late last night, in a post entitled Short Sales are the Answer, I said the following:

It is a shame that there is no political will on either side of the isle to hold lenders feet to the fire to affect meaningful change, and defaulted homeowners must contend with a mad race to work a miracle with an uncaring, unresponsive monolithic entity before that monster forecloses, repossesses their home, wrecks their credit and crushes their dreams. This is not progress.

In reading this morning’s NY Times on the White Houses sheepishness (Hey Mr, Obama, can you pretend that Bank of America is General Motors?) and reflecting on Ms. Oppenheimer’s electioneering in lieu of addressing her constituents’ pain, my words are all too sadly true. Forget Washington for a moment. This is Westchester County’s state senate seat. This is our representative in Albany.

Show me someone up for election with the guts to stand up to lender’s unwillingness to change their architecture against short sales, which are a huge part of the solution, and G.O.P., Democrat or Martian, they’ll have my vote.

Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , | Leave a Comment »

Foreclosure Moratorium Will Boost New York Short Sales

October 13, 2010 by J. Philip Faranda

Now that Bank of America has joined Chase and GMAC in suspending foreclosures in 23 states (BoA is actually suspending them in all 50), including New York, the entire industry is abuzz with questions as to what the consequences are for the market, a recovery, and most of all, distressed homeowners. Now known as the robo-signing scandal, the issue is calling into question the legitimacy of thousands of foreclosures.

What’s more, with foreclosures halted, what will banks do to dispense with default properties and non-performing loans? The answer to my mind is clear: start paving the way for more short sales. Title is passed from one owner to the next with no interruptions or questions, the process saves the banks both time and money, and more borrowers can move on with their lives with dignity which is all to often a missing element of the current system.

The advantages are enormous:

  • In a short sale, the bank doesn’t have to take 1-2 years to repossess the home. They get their money faster.
  • In a short sale, there are no legal fees associated with a foreclosure.
  • In a short sale, the bank does not have to manage the property, put the utilities in their name, or winterize the property except in rare cases.
  • Short sales are seldom boarded up, vandalized, or vacant. They therefore net the lender more money.

This has always been the case, and made me wonder why banks are so difficult, but with foreclosures off the table short sales now appear to be their only option.  With New York among the states that more lenders are suspending foreclosures, this gives distressed sellers breathing room, and, more importantly to my thinking, dignity.

Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , | 1 Comment »

Who Pays the Commission in a Short Sale?

October 13, 2010 by J. Philip Faranda

When a question is asked of me more than once it is a good bet that it is a common one, so I’ll post briefly today on who pays the commission in short sale. The answer is simple: The lender pays the real estate commission.

In a regular sale, real estate commission is paid from the proceeds of the equity. In a short sale, sellers who cannot pay their mortgage and do not have the funds to cover a short fall cannot pay the commission, because there is no equity, no proceeds, and no outside resources. Therefore, as part of their loss, the mortgage company pays the real estate commission. They also wash away the past due payments, pay the back taxes, and anything else needed to pass the home to the new buyer with clear title.

No real estate broker should ever require a short sale client to deposit money in escrow, or take a fee in advance of an approved sale and closing. It is antithetical to the contingent nature of our business. The commission is an incentive to do your job, and I would be suspicious of anyone who asks for money up front.

Again, to be clear: In a short sale, the bank pays the commission. I have closed short sales in Yonkers to Suffern, Chappaqua to Poughkeepsie , and dozens of places in between. I have never taken a dime from sellers.  The bank has always paid the commission.

Posted in Commentary | Tagged , | 1 Comment »

Yonkers Short Sale: Do You Need an Attorney? YES

October 6, 2010 by J. Philip Faranda

Here’s one from the other side of the closing table, where I represented buyers on a 5-month odyssey to purchase a short sale in Yonkers. It made me appreciate the waiting game that buyers must endure, and how valuable status updates are to home purchasers of a short sale in order to stay engaged and committed to the purchase. Buyers need to be updated to, among other things, time their mortgage application, appraisal, and rate lock.

Note that I did not say anything about ordering title work. Title work in a short sale MUST be ordered by the seller’s attorney in the beginning to ensure there are no 3rd party liens that might scuttle the sale later on. 3rd party judgments and liens are common in default properties because when there is financial hardship, there are other bills than the mortgage that go unpaid.

The home my clients sought to purchase was perfect for them- a recent build on a dead end street with a good location for their commute to work. Things on the seller’s side were not organized from what I could see, until I made substantive contact with the seller’s attorney, who entered negotiations later in the game when a private 3rd party hired to negotiate the short sale was sacked mid-process. I can’t judge their circumstances, only the scenery from our point of view. From contract signing in May until August, everything seemed to be in limbo.

In early August, the seller’s attorney spearheaded negotiations. The short sale was approved in late September with terms the seller could live with. We closed September 29, which was a nice anniversary gift. His communication with me was crucial to my buyer clients’ management of their mortgage financing. When they were ready, we were ready. No delays, no snafus, minimal drama.

This was a unique file in that I had a direct line of communication with the seller’s attorney, which brokers seldom have. Typically, I would deal with a listing agent, but that agent would be the conduit to their attorney. But the bottom line here is that the attorney’s involvement was indispensable, and the communication with our side affected a successful outcome. New York is different from many states where an attorney is not part of the process. But in New York, Connecticut, and New Jersey, it is clear to me through experience that without an attorney closely involved in the short sale, the closing may not succeed.

Posted in Success Stories | Tagged , , , | Leave a Comment »

Peekskill Short Sale: Lessons to Learn

October 3, 2010 by J. Philip Faranda

We recently closed on the short sale in Peekskill, NY and it was rather unique. For one, the seller, a licensed professional, had to come up with some money at the closing due to being lighter in the hardship department. We warned the client of this possibility, but the way the bank went about it is indicative of why we have the problems we have in this economy. In addition to that, the buyer almost couldn’t close because of a discrepancy on the taxes.

The seller had relocated out of state and was renting the home. He moved to an area of the country with a lower salary scale, and was now teaching in his field rather than in practice. He therefore could not write a check for 6 figures to make the lender whole. There was some acrimony with the lender as to the value of the home; as  is often the case, the lender broker price opinion was done by an out of area licensee with no clue on the local market, and their “value” came in at a  price point where we once were, and could not get anyone to even come look. Bad BPOs are a problem that could easily be solved by using local brokers and appraisers. Why lenders do not grasp this is beyond me.

Meanwhile, the buyer’s purchase appraisal came in too low! Their bank was reticent to loan that much on the home, and there was another problem with a re assessment raising our published tax figure. Evidently, both my and the buyer agent’s verification of taxes came prior to the bill going up. Their appraiser caught the discrepancy. This temporarily put the kabosh on the buyer’s mortgage.

As with many short sales, it was our job to go to the mat with the lender to get the deal done, which we did. The seller had to write a small percentage of the shortfall at closing to avoid any long term deficiency, which he had and did.

Lessons learned:

  • Re-verify taxes when homes are listed on or near reassessment dates.
  • For the banks: stop using out of market brokers for price opinions. The same goes for out of market appraisers.

I give credit to our proactive seller for helping himself and remaining in strong communication. I am more leery than ever as to the wisdom of those people at the lenders, whose myopia about local knowledge for BPOs contributes to muddying up the short sale process and causing more stress and angst. I am sure this is part of the issue with recent moratoriums on foreclosures- the banks are getting unforgivably sloppy.

Posted in Short Sales, Success Stories | Tagged , , , | Leave a Comment »

Ossining Short Sale: Undramatic

September 2, 2010 by J. Philip Faranda

As short sales become more prevalent in Westchester County, the anxiety around their newness tends to fade. With familiarity comes some confidence. We just closed on one such sale. The sellers were being transferred out of state after buying the house in 2006, right after the peak. They bought with a smaller downpayment, so when the market crashed they joined millions of other Americans (and thousands of fellow Westchester County homeowners) in being under water.

Being upside down is not necessarily a problem unless you have to sell. Well, when you get transferred, you typically have to sell. In going over our options, it was clear that they could not rent the home out and remain in the black, and there was no savings. Their housing expense in their new home would not enable them to carry two homes, so the house in Ossining couldn’t be kept. A short sale would be their best option. Wisely, they consulted with their attorney as part of the decision.

After listing the house they made one price adjustment, an offer came in, we went to contract, submitted everything to the lender, and it was accepted. No problems with the appraisal on either side, no issues with the new buyer, the buyer agent did her job, and we closed. The only drama was how a boat left in the driveway would be dispensed with. The seller’s relatives removed it.

It was that simple.

It took a little over 4 months for the short sale to be approved. I have to give credit to my clients for doing everything they needed to do, and to the buyers for having their act together when the approval came through. There was no drama and no suffering because everyone did their job and kept focus.

Posted in Short Sales | Tagged , , | Leave a Comment »

Stress: The Worst Part of a Short Sale

August 7, 2010 by J. Philip Faranda

I have listed two new short sale homes this weekend. One is just shy of $1 million, the other is around $200,000. One is in lower Westchester County, the other is in central Dutchess County. One is almost 3000 square feet, the other is closer to 1300 square feet. Although it doesn’t sound likely, the two clients have a great deal in common.

  • Both are responsible and hard working
  • Both are frugal and fiscally conservative in their management of money
  • Both are college educated professionals
  • Neither fits the profile of an irresponsible foreclosure candidate
  • Both are mortified at their situation, feel alone, and under considerable stress.

What is different about many short sales in the current market is that due to job loss, loss of income, or something else completely not related to their responsible behavior, otherwise good and accountable people are finding themselves needing to sell and not having the equity to cover their costs. These were not sub prime borrowers. They are stable. One had his business fail due to the recession, and the other has lost income. This is unfamiliar territory for both, because they have always watched their Ps and Qs and never overextended their credit.

In both cases, I have let them know that they are not alone, and that they are actually smart for getting proactive and contacting me. In both cases, I will get them out from under their upside down mortgage and get their short sale approved. They will not owe the lender anything after they close. They will get a fresh start. I will keep a roof over their head and help them repair their credit over time. In 2 years after they sell, if they want, I’ll help them buy another house.

The money is not the worst part of a short sale. No one starves or has no clothes. The worst part is the stress. Address the stress or find someone to help, and you’ll be lucid enough to help yourself. That goes for Scarsdale. And Chappaqua. And Yonkers. And New Rochelle. Everywhere.

Posted in Commentary | Tagged , , , | 2 Comments »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 394 other followers